Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 93 Warning: chmod() expects exactly 2 parameters, 3 given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 94 Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/tipjournal/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-11.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 100 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 101 Visceral artery pseudoaneurysm after blunt trauma

Visceral artery pseudoaneurysm after blunt trauma

Article information

Trauma Image Proced. 2023;8(1):4-7
Publication date (electronic) : 2023 June 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.24184/tip.2023.8.1.4
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Hwaseong, Korea
2Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Trauma Center, Wonju, Korea
Correspondence to Pil Young Jung Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Trauma Center, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 26426, Korea Tel: +82-33-741-0882 Fax: +82-33-741-0574 E-mail: surgery4trauma@yonsei.ac.kr
Received 2022 June 29; Revised 2022 August 12; Accepted 2022 August 17.

Abstract

Visceral artery pseudoaneurysms after trauma are relatively rare but are associated with a high mortality rate in the case of rupture; thus, they are typically treated when identified. Traumatic pseudoaneurysms arising from the branches of the superior mesenteric artery are rarely described; however, they are clinically important lesions because of the risk of hemorrhage and bowel ischemia. Herein, we present a case of a visceral artery pseudoaneurysm identified approximately 2 months after abdominal blunt trauma.

Introduction

Visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) and visceral artery pseudoaneurysms (VAPAs) are relatively rare. Traumatic pseudoaneurysms arising from the branches of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) are rarely reported; however, they are clinically important lesions because of the risk of hemorrhage and bowel ischemia [1].

Herein, we present the case of a patient with an SMA branch pseudoaneurysm associated with blunt trauma.

Case presentation

A 77-year-old man with hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia came to our trauma center after a car accident. He complained of abdominal pain and left chest wall pain, and computed tomography (CT) revealed ileal mesenteric injury with active arterial extravasation and hematoma (Fig. 1). An emergency laparotomy was performed, and serosal tear, perforation of the jejunum, and rupture of the mesentry were repaired. In addition, the patient had Jefferson fracture type III, multiple rib fractures, hemothorax, and hemopericardium. After surgery, acute kidney injury and rhabdomyolysis occurred during conservative treatment and were treated with continuous renal replacement therapy. On the 38th hospital day, the patient’s condition improved and he was transferred to a lower-level hospital.

Fig. 1.

The initial computed tomography image shows mesenteric injury and arterial extravasation. Axial (A) and coronal (B) images.

Approximately 1 month after transfer, the patient complained of abdominal pain and distension. CT performed at the hospital where he was transferred detected a pseudoaneurysm in an SMA branch. The pseudoaneurysm was located in the area where the hematoma was observed in the previous trauma, and he was transferred to our hospital again (Fig. 2). He had no symptoms other than mild fever and abdominal pain, and his vital signs were stable. On the day of admission, laparotomy was performed because of a pseudoaneurysm accompanied by inflammation. When vascular embolization was performed, the risk of additional complications, such as intestinal necrosis, was considered. After the excision of the pulsatile mass, the bleeding site was ligated and the small bowel with ischemic changes was segmentally resected (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2.

Approximately 2 months after trauma, computed tomography shows the formation of a pseudoaneurysm at the site of the previous injury. Axial (A) and coronal (B) images.

Fig. 3.

Specimen after segmental resection of the small intestine.

Discussion

VAPAs can be a result of trauma, surgery, or infection; their rupture constitutes an abdominal emergency. Because these are rare aneurysms, the rate of rupture of SMA branch aneurysms is unknown. Although the rupture risk is thought to be low, the mortality rate associated with the rupture ranges from 20% to 40% [2,3]. VAPAs represent essentially a contained rupture that is only constrained by a fibrous capsule because all three layers of the arterial wall are disrupted. Compared with true aneurysms, pseudoaneurysms have a higher risk of overt rupture; thus, VAPAs are typically treated when identified. Depending on the diameter and location, pseudoaneurysm rupture is associated with a mortality rate ranging from 25% to 70% [4]. As mentioned earlier, VAAs/VAPAs are very rare and not all traumatic artery damage results in pseudoaneurysm formation. In this case, despite the successful repair of the initial damage, a pseudoaneurysm was formed over time because of traumatic visceral arterial injury. A noncontrasted abdominal CT performed on the 16th hospital day during the first admission showed a lesion suggestive of pseudoaneurysm (Fig. 4). However, this is a retrospective analysis, and at that time, it was just considered an improving state of mesenteric damage.

Fig. 4.

On the 16th hospital day, follow-up computed tomography (noncontrasted) shows a lesion suggestive of pseudoaneurysm. Axial (A) and coronal (B) images.

Therefore, in the follow-up of patients with visceral arterial injuries, re-evaluation via CT should be considered if necessary. Open surgical repair and reconstruction may remain the optimal strategy for some VAAs/VAPAs, particularly in patients with unstable hemodynamics and requiring emergency repair [5]. In other cases, endovascular intervention may be considered.

Notes

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Repasky RG, Tisnado J, Freedman AM. Transcatheter embolization of a superior mesenteric artery pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1993;4:241e4.
2. Carr SC, Pearce WH, Vogelzang RL, McCarthy WJ, Nemcek AA Jr, Yao JS. Current management of visceral artery aneurysms. Surgery 1996;120:627e33.
3. Messina LM, Shanley CJ. Visceral artery aneurysms. Surg Clin N Am 1997;77:425e42.
4. Ferrero E, Viazzo A, Ferri M, Robaldo A, Piazza S, Beradi G, et al. Management and urgent repair of ruptured visceral artery aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2011;25:981.e7.
5. Hogendoorn W, Lavida A, Hunink MG, Moll FL, Geroulakos G, Muhs BE, et al. Cost-effectiveness of endovascular repair, open repair, and conservative management of splenic artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2015;61:1432.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

The initial computed tomography image shows mesenteric injury and arterial extravasation. Axial (A) and coronal (B) images.

Fig. 2.

Approximately 2 months after trauma, computed tomography shows the formation of a pseudoaneurysm at the site of the previous injury. Axial (A) and coronal (B) images.

Fig. 3.

Specimen after segmental resection of the small intestine.

Fig. 4.

On the 16th hospital day, follow-up computed tomography (noncontrasted) shows a lesion suggestive of pseudoaneurysm. Axial (A) and coronal (B) images.